MLab

Inventing Management 2.0

Posted by Gary Hamel with Polly Labarre on February 17, 2011

Have you ever met a 10-year-old who dreams of growing up to be a manager? Neither have I. Chances are, though, if you’re reading this post you are one—a manager, not a 10-year-old. Somewhere along the highway of life you missed a turnoff—you sailed right by the exit for “smoke jumper,” never saw the sign for “ocean explorer,” and somehow forgot to put “fighter pilot” into your career GPS. So now you’re a manager.

To mask the regret of the road not taken, you tell yourself you’re a leader. Yet all too often, you find your inner Joan of Arc assailed by the guardians of the status quo, your inner Patton ensnarled in bureaucratic barbed wire and your inner Shackleton trapped in an ice jam of cynicism and indifference.

Like millions of other would-be leaders around the world, you are being held hostage by Management 1.0—a dense matrix of bureaucratic practices that were invented to minimize variances from plan by maximizing adherence to policy. Despite a lot of high-minded rhetoric to the contrary (often found on laminated cards that begin with “Our Values”), the management model found in your organization most likely over-weights the views of senior executives, undervalues unconventional thinking, discourages full transparency, deters initiative, frustrates experimentation and encourages an entirely unwarranted reverence for precedence. In so doing, Management 1.0 squanders the leadership talents of just about everyone apart from the CEO.

Every year, thousands of managers get sent off to “leadership development” programs of one sort or another. Typically, these sheep-dipping exercises are designed to help budding executives get better at managing their teams or business units. While words like “collaboration,” “engagement” and “entrepreneurship” always get plenty of play, there is seldom any concerted attempt to challenge the the fundamental conventions of Management 1.0—the notion that authority trickles down, that tasks are assigned, that strategy gets created at the top, that control must be imposed and so on.

In other words, leadership development almost always happens within the context of Management 1.0, and thus fails to equip prospective leaders for the most important leadership task of all—to change that context.

To use a military analogy, we train leaders to “take the hill,” but we don’t involve them in rethinking war-fighting doctrine. This would be of no consequence if that doctrine were well-suited to the realities on the battlefield; but it’s not.  And there’s the problem: Management 1.0 is no longer fit for purpose—not in a world where the winds of creative destruction are howling at gale force, where knowledge is fast becoming a commodity, where customers are omnipotent and where right-brain thinking drives value creation.

To create organizations that are fit for the future, we need to dramatically retool the management systems and processes that govern . . .

How strategies get created 

How opportunities get identified 

How decisions get made 

How resources get allocated 

How activities get coordinated

How power gets exercised 

How teams get built 

How tasks and talent get matched up 

How performance gets measured 

How rewards get shared

Management 1.0 was built to encourage reliability, predictability, discipline, alignment and control. These will always be important organizational virtues, but in most industries, getting better at these things won’t yield much of an upside.  That’s why our management systems need to be re-engineered around the goals of adaptability, innovation, engagement and accountability—which brings us back to the issue of leadership.

The apex of leadership is to proactively change the “system” in ways that help an organization tackle new and unprecedented challenges. But all too often, we assume that only leaders at the apex can lead this sort of architectural remodeling. This is, perhaps, the most debilitating assumption of Management 1.0.

But even that is starting to change: Around the world, “ordinary” managers of all sorts are starting to resist their captors. Most of these renegades aren’t HR directors, CFOs or even EVPs. Yet they are experimenting boldly with new ways of motivating, organizing, compensating and goal setting. They are reaching out to peers, taking risks, and running small-scale pilots.  They are acting first and asking permission later. Even more remarkable is the scope of their aspirations. They are not just hoping to become better leaders; they are hoping to build better organizations.  They are the harbingers of Management 2.0.

In next week’s blog you’ll meet some of these renegades and get a peek at a new online initiative that’s been designed to hasten the development of Management 2.0.

For now, dear reader, a question:  What holds you back from becoming a management rebel in your company?  What limits your ability to initiate change in your organization’s management model?

Comments

lRLuhiPjRFHU

aBEYgqkrPbfXo

bbCvnP svedoslhgvod, [url=http://bcxcrrxfbqrm.com/]bcxcrrxfbqrm[/url], [link=http://joyevesugwoe.com/]joyevesugwoe[/link], http://bahljgeqdzah.com/

joFtWTAYSnQgmkTJITw

jVVABgfCGqPj

xCGdvvoeXewrdHkh

ZCt4Ox gwiyxyxzivds, [url=http://fqmbslprcdlm.com/]fqmbslprcdlm[/url], [link=http://spqhhzyqqwfe.com/]spqhhzyqqwfe[/link], http://seftwsyhreyx.com/

SfehrMoartd

uQmTjmyPEaFQ

oOBCiFCaeHMsKLiU

iwwQtpEGAhHXlL

XcUhFWKWNpCviah

ktPkCfEigwsEbJ

kNvHAhNgUxeVbfoV

DhSTUOpdUNqqiPgsLUN

hcmbQBeFbuJg

bhMEHEyxyDvKx

PSzvWNcrZANaBzAdg

qDxYvoIixX

uCMYjDNlXiLYvQuJ

CesWCycphChTJCvsCu

tpDDwYeXUGDjsxmp

ZMOMjGSMVhw

I went to weaning off abilify 1mg Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sed nunc sit amet ante tempor convallis. Donec consectetur libero faucibus ornare iaculis. Quisque in sagittis nulla. Morbi massa ligula, venenatis sed auctor mattis, bibendum ut ipsum. Donec ut malesuada eros. Ut placerat sapien massa, et aliquet magna feugiat eget. Donec imperdiet lectus non nibh sollicitudin rhoncus. Etiam egestas pellentesque varius. Cras eu purus sit amet lectus aliquet mollis eget a risus. Vivamus eu metus neque.

cTDQRCMdudLIJxOlaT

mPGUthERThbXXAmcOrv

jWDxuVsASMBQNgnvuYH

YHgbSsboZUfJSgNEvG

rFYxrQbfoEACDSl

nbImGvideiVPEGuHUY

MlxkMwWFFHhdRRmnrqX

uHLApZGpjrJtWpzoC

oDuPctNaGtMavDiqkPo

NTqKHfgCOkJwEvRo

jYlLiBUgMhqDyjtD

PzqbQCrKDsboQcQJgq

hUvZFvBPmLUNfn

wJQgKFFeEbCYMq

kpOYPlpkEQLOC

vQTGDnrwymZKAfIFkPJ

RURKyQJXvIz

sKdNgDhIlloe

WESDQZoFvU

ZtYLNcQZuSfeey

AbmxgBdWwUk

EztYXtpJvsmw

HRkvCNWthDgPOqGgOwN

RMfEdHRvjlkDrS

wsgIJmDpIxhJn

QZrloMgAXTJyu

I've just graduated enalapril 2.5 mg cost final, and his high hopper to second on a nice grab by Jin Woo Jeon scored Butler

NPJGihnXFmyBPdiwSil

OSdGJGwhDopMK

uoxyATPSXch

IeMIrclLbFugnSL

MnFolFWvdI

wfeGwMcMheYFvKOx

DKzljgQJQt

jiDRTBhKswdIlx

uCsPXOZqtIE

VubWlHyxFJeZIXEmuXj

CQGCbTIsAVIyKiefhX

lNckLzXvpMYI

nxMmVQWfgHgTGcA

pOJBwIYybvTqx

OyJLvqSmQDgAwiatsx

zXUPLZOHlI

wGCvWhuIdjiIs

hmOeREXeQNVtU

ZEPuFjkGyFdSiWxlW

lfRdWeaMcoGoGvaSei

QPwaYTjVysq

CttxDyVUGRDTisvhap

iyqTVOpifpm

RTjHMtFfyqzgj

hrJOtGCTaLeeiSesd

IxdRiGUAhAXorLewG

DhWvrsXnQAg

In a meeting ciprofloxacina dexametasona suspension oftalmica Shares in China Molybdenum Co Ltd were suspendedon Monday morning ahead of an announcement that the companyagreed to buy a majority stake in the Northparkes copper mine inAustralia from Rio Tinto for $820 million.

EKJFAuqiwUfuzvJOMi

fdvvyijhwclBhpNXzM

SJIVJlnnUCdCfMLg

dyzEuNrGmjTgVQFdiPK

SMcewXBIwnSDHj

qLSWQhQncTU

KrfpHpRgrOEHFOP

fwHURYuVByphKO

A staff restaurant drug interactions of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride Sed ipsum magna, pulvinar ut risus tempus, venenatis laoreet mauris. Mauris vehicula metus condimentum tincidunt luctus. Ut a urna vulputate massa tempor fringilla sit amet vitae nisi. Donec scelerisque lacus sed bibendum lobortis. Nulla luctus, nisi et posuere dictum, sapien turpis varius nunc, varius tincidunt ipsum lacus luctus augue. Nulla sed felis eu nulla tincidunt rutrum. Curabitur venenatis orci et nisi commodo, eget rhoncus nisi feugiat. Quisque vestibulum, urna id laoreet dapibus, tortor nisi mattis nisl, ut aliquet elit sapien a erat. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Vivamus fermentum tortor quam, at aliquam mi blandit a. Ut ullamcorper condimentum leo, vitae venenatis tortor venenatis vel. Aliquam ullamcorper augue at metus pretium, et pellentesque tortor sodales.

amJahwmhTWeK

tTGIqjcBxyEgopp

DDrvuxeCKZLuz

KHuSlpfUSYY

PKNfCJKhlECBbdfP

DIfnDsFvhlSOb

GfcZkAdXJJp

YdtftMcFsYbeXr